Quarterly Scientific Journal of Audio-Visual Media

Quarterly Scientific Journal of Audio-Visual Media

An Approach to Understanding the Nature of Media in Heidegger’s Thought Through Understanding Language

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 M.A. in Philosophy of Media, Department of Philosophy of Media, Faculty of Religion and Media, IRIB University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies , IRIB University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Religion and Media, Religion and Media Faculty, IRIB University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Paying attention to media from a philosophical perspective can be of great help in understanding and utilizing it appropriately. In this article, one of the most important topics in media philosophy - namely, the essence of media - is examined by looking at the views of Martin Heidegger, which can be useful in reaching an independent and indigenous theory. The main question is whether, according to Heidegger, the media has an essence? To reach the answer to this question, Heidegger's views have been examined using philosophical analysis method and with the mediation of two media philosophers - Gunkel and Taylor. Understanding what the media is has been done by looking at one of the most important topics in Heidegger's philosophy – namely, language - and the relationship between the concept of language and media has been analyzed. In the following, it was attempted to analyze the two perspectives of essentialism and instrumentalism according to the views of media thinkers based on the new type of understanding that is obtained from language. Finally, it was shown that media are not simply communication tools that relay existing information, but function as direct and active participants in revealing the existence of things that are thought to merely represent them. For Heidegger, construction and disclosure in all kinds of technology - and in particular, media - both language and new media, have marked the era of the world image, and ultimately everything in the world is realized through mediatization. But at the same time, given these linguistic characteristics, it is possible to use media for openness and poetry.
Keywords

-          Carey, J. 1989. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New York: Routledge.
-          Derrida, D. 1976. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. De la Grammatologie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
-          Derrida, D. 1993. Afterword to Limited Inc., trans. Samuel Weber. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 54–111.
-          Gadamer, H. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck
-          Gunkel, David, Taylor, Paul. 2014, Heidegger and the Media (Theory and Media), polity
-          Heidegger, M. 1967. What is a Thing? Trans. W. B. Barton and Vera Deutsch. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company. Die Frage nach dem Ding. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
-          Heidegger, M. 1971 . ‘. . . Poetically Man Dwells . . .’ Trans. Albert Hofstadter. In Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 29213. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske, pp. 98181.
-          Heidegger, M. 1971. ‘Building Dwelling Thinking’. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. In Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 62143. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske, pp. 56139.
-          Heidegger, M. 1971. ‘The Nature of Language.’ In On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 57111. Unterwegs zur Sprache. Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske.
-          Heidegger, M. 1977. ‘The Age of the World Picture’. Trans. William Lovitt. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Torchbooks, pp. 54115. Die Zeit des Weltbildes in Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-          Heidegger, M. 1982. Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-          Heidegger,  M. 1998. ‘Plato’s Doctrine of Truth’. Trans. T. Sheehan. In W. McNeill (ed.), Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–82. Wegmarken. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-          Heidegger, M. 1998. ‘Traditional Language and Technological Language’. Trans. Wanda Torres Gregory. Journal of Philosophical Inquiry, 23(2): 129–45.
-          Heidegger, M. 2000. Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Einführung in die Metaphysik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
-          Heidegger, M. 2009. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. Trans. Wanda Torres Gregory and Yvonne Una. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Logik als die Frage nach dem Wesen der Sprache. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klosterman.
-          Heidegger, M. 2012. Bremen and Freiburg Lectures: Insight into That Which Is and The Basic  Principles of Thinking. Trans. Andrew J. Mitchell. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-          Plato. 1987. Republic, trans. Paul Shorey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-          Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
-          Stiegler, B. 1994. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus, Paris: galilee
-          Wiener, N. 1961. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-          Wills, A. 2006. Heidegger and the Media, Parallax, Volume 12, Issue 2
-          Wittgenstein, L. 1995 [1922]. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York: Routledge.
-          Wrathall, M. A. 2011. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.